Sportbike World banner

1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
3 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I just wanted some peoples opinions on the advantages and
disadvatages of the two types of forks. In general usd forks
seem to be regarded as better but there's some bikes with
great coventional forks. Is there a simple answer to which is
better and why?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
63 Posts
The biggest difference besides the unsprung weight difference is actually usd forks are more rigid. Where they mount to the clamps ,are much larger. Im going back several years but I remember regular forks were 38-40 mm wide. Usd front ends are much bigger around,like the "old" style lower legs are. The increased strength comes from the actual clamps being almost twice the size along with the increased 'bracket ' surface area. 99 % of riders really couldnt tell the difference if they couldnt see it. Forks extending and collapsing under turning and or breaking would have to pretty aggresive for 'mortal' throttle jockeys to feel differences. The reason that all bikes have them is marketing. It sells more toys when something "new" pops up. Yea,,Im as guilty as anyone! Charlie
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,798 Posts
While I agree that most riders will never notice the increased stiffness, less unsprung weight will benefit just about anyone.
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top