|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|04-14-2004 05:41 PM|
I actually felt sorry for GW last night when he was asked why he and Cheney will be testifieing together for the 9-11 commision. He tried to skirt it first and then when the questioner wouldn't take that, he refused to answer the question, and it was painful to watch. The guy is simply in over his head. The rest of last night's press conference was another hour of the same. No information and cheerleading his dogma.
As far as the taxes? They make more than enough, made it in no small thanks to our country's opportunities, and should put their patriotic money where there patriotic mouths are, not take a tax cut while the financial health of the country is in the toilet and their fearless leader has taken us to war. Let that be its own topic because it's way more involved than just income tax rates. The regressive taxes throughout our system still have the poorest people on through the middle class contributing the largest percentage of their income to taxes. To give you a bench mark shot from the hip on the single issue of income taxes, I'll start to sympathize when they're over 50% after the first million. You do realize, they are at the exact same rate as everyone else at each increment along the way, right? The higher percentages only kick up as you move up the brackets and only on that money over and above.
30, 40, or even 50 percent on the very highest end of a pretty extravagent income, to support the system, country, and infrastructure that afforded you that income, is not unreasonable in my sense of right and fair play. I see that as plain as the nose on my face.
|04-14-2004 02:57 PM|
I still fail to see how Bush is a liar, when he went on the information everyone believed at the time. As for him having proof to the contrary and still charging in with his big hard-on for Saddam, we'll never know as I doubt we'll ever have access to everything he saw.
On another tangent, why is it ok for everyone to call Bush "stupid?" I seem to remember a thread not that long ago where someone criticized Kennedy as being a "damn drunk" and you really let them have it, saying that that was unfair and unacceptable in light of his history. You then proceeded to post numerous excuses that allowed Kennedy's behavior. Whether he deserves to be or not, I still think he's a damn drunk. A damn drunk is a damn drunk, no matter the root cause of it. However, using your own defense tactic to show Bush is not "stupid", simply look at his education background. I don't see how anyone can honestly say he is stupid, based on his prior experiences. So he's not a great speaker, which makes him sound funny sometimes, but many people aren't good public speakers. Does that mean he is a bad leader? A very significant number of people in this country think he is doing a good job....enough, IMO, to put him back in for another 4. It should be an interesting November. I'm torn as to whether or not it will be close or an absolute blowout. Obviously that can depend on what happens up until then though, so we'll see.
Any thoughts on the tax issues I brought up, or are you researching? Knowing you I am sure you won't let it go unaddressed (and please realize I mean that as a compliment, not an insult).
|04-14-2004 02:43 PM|
|04-14-2004 02:15 PM|
12 of the 19 quotes are post-2000....
The post pointed out that the speakers are now calling Bush a liar, which you didn't even try to respond to, you go immediately into his tax cuts and his leadership abilities.
I'll have to look around to find where I saw this, but it dealt with the tax cuts you seem so powerfully against. It basically went deeper than the "tax cuts for people who make $200,000 or more are evil" and went on to show that that group was paying somewhere in the 30's as a percentage of their tax. It's been a few years since I filled out my taxes (thanks hon!) but if memory serves I pay somewhere in the 20's.....I think anyway. This argument comes down to whether or not you believe that the wealthier you are the more you should pay percentage wise, or if you believe more in a flat tax system where we all pay the same percentage. I'll not try to get into an argument about this as I am quite honestly not well informed enough to do so. All I point out is that the wealthier are paying an enormous amount of taxes, so it's not like Bush is doing away with their taxes altogether as many people try to make it sound.
As far as his leadership....I feel after 9/11 people looked to him to step up and take charge, and that he did. I'll not throw a blanket defense over everything he has said or done as I don't agree with all of it. I do think he did the best he could and overall did a good job of it, leaving some things to be desired.
Oh well....here we go again....
|04-14-2004 01:52 PM|
The majority of those democrats were against going to war without the UN. That source of yours surely has those quotes, too. I fit that category. The reason they felt that way is being proven out in the developments in Iraq.
It was GW who said, "you're either with us, or against us", to our long term allies. Great show of leadership and "I'm a uniter, not a divider" there, George. That was the point in the progression that any trust or respect for GW that I had was completely shattered. I could not, and still can't, believe that our president acted as he did in those months and on the public stage. That is the basis for my feelings that he is the stupidest SOB I've seen in power... EVER. His domestic policy, or lack thereof, further underscores it for me. Brazen money grabs for the wealthiest Americans, tax cuts during a war, etc. etc. etc.
Many of the quotes are extracted from the time when the US was trying to encourage the UN to get serious about the inspections, which finally happened. Prior to that, the case for WMD was quite strong and was, more importantly, unclear. That would apply to most quotes prior to 2000. The information gathered and summarized by the UN inspections leader Hans Blix sheds a lot of light on that era for those interested.
See ya George!
|04-14-2004 12:03 PM|
It is amazing how the facts are unimportant to so many, and how soon they forget!
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten time since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry( D - MA), and others Oct. 9,1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." > - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weap ons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real" - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
SO NOW EVERY ONE OF THESE SAME DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED--THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND HE TOOK US TO WAR UNECESSARILY!