Guardsman guilty of illegally transferring 'machine gun' after firearm malfunctions - Sportbike Forum: Sportbike Motorcycle Forums
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old 01-13-2008, 09:23 PM Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,890
Guardsman guilty of illegally transferring 'machine gun' after firearm malfunctions

What is this world coming to?


Sunday, January 13, 2008
Drill instructor convicted after rifle jams
Guardsman guilty of illegally transferring 'machine gun' after firearm malfunctions
Posted: January 13, 2008
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2008

A drill instructor in the National Guard has been convicted in a Wisconsin federal court of illegally transferring a machine gun after a rifle he loaned to a student malfunctioned, setting off three shots before jamming.
The verdict of guilty on one count in the case against David Olofson was confirmed yesterday by the clerk’s office in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
That means now that anyone whose weapon malfunctions is subject to charges of having or handling a banned gun, according to an expert witness who reports that the particular problem is a well-known malfunction and was even the subject of a recall from the manufacturer.
"If your semiautomatic rifle breaks or malfunctions you are now subject to prosecution. That is now a sad FACT. I guess we know now what Sen. Kennedy meant when he said he looked forward to working with [Acting Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Director] Mike Sullivan on Gun control issues, after his committee approved him for full Senate vote," Len Savage, a weaponry expert who runs Historic Arms LLC, said in a blog.
"To those in the sporting culture who have derided 'black guns' and so-called 'assault weapons'; Your double barreled shotgun is now next up to be seized and you could possibly be prosecuted if the ATF can get it to 'fire more than once,'" he wrote in a blog run by Red‘s Trading Post.
"Hey, but don't worry," Savage said. "The people testing it have no procedures in writing and the testing will be in secret. Also if you know of information that proves YOUR innocence, maybe the ATF won't claim that it's tax information at your trial and prevent YOUR judge from viewing it."
He told an interview with Jew‘s for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership that Olofson had been instructing a man in the use of guns, and the student asked to borrow a rifle for some shooting practice.
"Mr. Olofson was nice enough to accommodate him," Savage said. So the student, Robert Kiernicki, went to a range and fired about 120 rounds. "He went to put in another magazine and the rifle shot three times, then jammed," Savage said.
A couple of police officers who also were at the ranged immediately approached him and started asking questions about the "automatic" fire, and he told them it was a borrowed weapon.
"Mr. Olofson, being a responsible person, went down to the police station and said, 'I'm in the National Guard. I know what a machine gun looks like. That's not it,'" Savage said.
But instead of having the issues resolve, Savage said, it got worse.
He reported that because of the malfunction, the rifle was seized and sent to the Firearm Technology Branch, the testing arm of the federal agency.
"The examined and test fired the rifle; then declared it to be 'just a rifle,'" Savage said. "You would think it would all be resolved at this point, this was merely the beginning."
He said the Special Agent in Charge, Jody Keeku, asked for a re-test and specified that the tests use "soft primered commercial ammunition."
"FTB has no standardized testing procedures, in fact it has no written procedures at all for testing firearms," Savage said. "They had no standard to stick to, and gleefully tried again. The results this time...'a machinegun.' ATF with a self-admitted 50 percent error rate pursued an indictment and Mr. Olofson was charged with 'Unlawful transfer of a machinegun.'. Not possession, not even Robert Kiernicki was charged with possession (who actually possessed the rifle), though the ATF paid Mr. Kiernicki 'an undisclosed amount of money' to testify against Mr. Olofson at trial," Savage said.
And then during the trial, the prosecution told the judge it would not provide some information defense lawyers felt would clear their client, Savage continued. That included the fact that the rifle's manufacturer, Olympic Arms, had been issued a recall notice for that very model in 1986 over an issue of guns inadvertently slipping into full automatic mode, if certain parts were worn or if certain ammunition was used.
Ryan Horsley, who posts the Red‘s Trading Post blog, said the results were "very concerning."
"Basically if your Ruger 10/22, Browning Citori Over and Under or Remington 11-87 malfunction and fire more than one round at a time; the ATF will now consider it a machine gun," he wrote.
He told WND he's had personal experience with guns that malfunction and fire more than one bullet. Even double-barreled shotguns, if both shells would be released at once, now could be considered machine guns and illegal, he said.
"This precedent is very dangerous," he said.
Defense attorneys in the Olofson case couldn't be reached immediately to determine whether an appeal would be pursued, but Savage noted the arguments by assistant U.S. Attorney Greg Hannstad, who handled the prosecution.
"Haanstad claimed the law does not exempt a malfunction. He claims that it states 'any weapon that shoots more than once without manual reloading, per function of the trigger is a machinegun.' To clarify when I was on the stand, I asked him, 'Are you saying if I take my Great Granddaddy's double barrel out and I pull one trigger and both barrels go off, it's a machinegun?' He went back to … 'any weapon that shoots…'" Savage said.
On the Red's blog, commenters were incensed.
"'Innocent until proven guilty' has been transformed by the ATF into 'guilty until framed,' said LibertyPlease.
Horsley also told WND the 2008 edition of Firearms Law Deskbook quotes from a 1999 case in which the court concluded the law on automatic weapons "is not intended to trap the unwary innocent, and well intentioned citizen who possess an otherwise semi-automatic weapon that, by repeated use of the weapon, by the inevitable wear and tear of sporting activities, or by means of mere inattention, happenstance, or illfortune, fires more than semi-automatically."
ZX6R1033 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old 01-14-2008, 03:47 AM
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,798
Thats pretty silly. If they could prove the malfunction was a result of tampering, I'd see the case, otherwise, I'd hope it gets an appeal

Vash is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old 01-15-2008, 12:20 PM
Registered User
Tippmann's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,373
Send a message via AIM to Tippmann Send a message via Yahoo to Tippmann
I just don't get it. Did they think it was a modded to shoot full auto or what?

Originally posted by sidewaysducati
If you are reading this then this warning is for you. Every word you read of this useless fine print is another second off your life. Don't you have other things to do? Is your life so empty that you honestly can't think of a better way to spend these moments? Or are you so impressed with authority that you give respect and credence to all who claim it? Do you read everything you're supposed to read? Do you think everything you're supposed to think? Buy what you're told you should want? Get out of your apartment. Meet a member of the opposite sex. Stop the excessive shopping and masturbation. Quit your job. Start a fight. Prove you're alive. If you don't claim your humanity you will become a statistic. You have been warned...... Tyler
Tippmann is offline  
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old 01-15-2008, 12:25 PM
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,798
Originally posted by Tippmann
I just don't get it. Did they think it was a modded to shoot full auto or what?
Apparently it doesnt matter that it was malfunctioning, just that it was firing full auto. There is no exception in the law for a mulfunction, so if it fires full auto, its illegal, and one is responsible for it. Stupid law.. wouldnt be the first... But this is what persecutiorial descretion is supposed to be for.

Vash is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old 01-15-2008, 01:28 PM Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,890
Originally posted by Vash
There is no exception in the law for a mulfunction, so if it fires full auto, its illegal, and one is responsible for it.

Actually, a malfunction is a malfunction. When your rifle starts slam-firing, there is no law that constitutes that as a full auto.

The law on Full Autos is VERY clear... if your rifle shoots more than once for every one time you pull the trigger.

In any event, There has been a TON of debating on the gun forums in the past week about this, and eventually a link surfaced for a post on This thread was started by the man being charged... and there is a LOT more to the story than the article I had originally posted.

The thread starts out with a description... One man loaned his AR to another man who lived just down the street. (Someone who wanted to eventually buy an AR). The guy who took posession of the AR had modified it to shoot full auto. He was on the firing line next to a bunch of cops when he decided to switch it over to FA and let it rip. THe rifle was confiscated instantly, and he was taken into custody. He claimed that the guy who had loaned him the rifle was the one who had modified it to shoot full auto, and he denied any knowledge of it. The guy the rifle belonged to was arrested, and his house was raided. All of his firearms were confiscated.

At least... that is his story. There is a HUGE debate on AR15 as to his legitimacy as well as the facts he is stating.

Anyway... here are a few links to other sources of information for anyone who wants to read more about it. - The Original Post

The Firing Line - Follow Up Thread 1

Sniper Central - Follow Up Thread 2 (Not a lot of info here)
ZX6R1033 is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old 01-15-2008, 01:30 PM
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,798
Glad to hear the law isnt entirely stupid

Vash is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Sportbike Forum: Sportbike Motorcycle Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome