Popular Science Magazine Article - Sportbike Forum: Sportbike Motorcycle Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old 06-19-2006, 08:28 AM Thread Starter
Moderator
 
DocThee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Madison Heights, MI 48071
Posts: 4,824
Send a message via AIM to DocThee Send a message via Yahoo to DocThee
Popular Science Magazine Article

So...last night after a long weekend, I plop down in the lazy boy to read my Popular Science Magazine...I found an interesting article on page 62 of this months mag.

Here is the link...

http://www.popsci.com/popsci/automot...cbccdrcrd.html

Basically they are saying the MotoGP technology hits the streets.

Oh, and Nicky Hayden's MotoGP Honda is $3 Million.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Keep the ride on...

AIM and Yahoo! - DocThee

"Anything can be a medicine or a poison."

Virtus Junxit Mors Non Seperabit
DocThee is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old 06-19-2006, 10:15 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,798
Man I expected better from popular science. Comparing the 211v and 1000RR is just plain stupid. Oh, no they have simular body panels! Cmon, I donno enough about injectors and chassis to make a qualified statement, but everything else was pure hogwash. Claiming that bridgestones are anything close to motogp tires? Or the there is no difference between 11k or 16k rpm? Give me a break.
Todays bikes are bad ass and all, but motogp is in a league of their own



Vash is offline  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old 06-19-2006, 03:44 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,992
Vash, I don't think they were really comparing them that closely. They were indicating that many of the concepts are shared, but commenting on the vast differences. Seriously, if you think about the technology we have in these street bikes, its pretty amazing. I remember seeing technical drawings somewhere on the suspension on the 1000r and 211V. They use similar geometry and mounting styles. I interpreted their comment about the redline differences as being somewhat tounge-in-cheek. 11k is pretty amazing for a production line engine. 16K is just plain awesome. (yea, yea, I know, the 06 R6 does it too, but how long will it do it for? Yamahas are toooo fragile.) Their point is that the speed at which technology gets to the consumer is increasing dramatically.
Kevlar7R is offline  
 
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old 06-19-2006, 08:48 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 237
the honda motogp guys said it best in an interview, "the body panels look similair, and thats where the similairities end"

the only things that are the same between the two bikes are the basic principles on while they, and all other motorcycles, are designed. MotoGP is in a league of there own, and while the basic ideas developed in MotoGP do find there way to the streets, very little of the actual technology does.
sodamninsane is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Sportbike Forum: Sportbike Motorcycle Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome