Here's a REAL problem... - Sportbike Forum: Sportbike Motorcycle Forums
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 21 (permalink) Old 11-03-2005, 03:31 PM Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,234
Thumbs down Here's a REAL problem...

On Wednesday the court dismissed a lawsuit brought by California parents who were outraged over a sex survey given to public school students in the first, third and fifth grades.

Among other things, the survey administered by the Palmdale School District asked children if they ever thought about having sex or touching other people's "private parts" and whether they could "stop thinking about having sex."

The parents argued that they -- not the public schools -- have the sole right "to control the upbringing of their children by introducing them to matters of and relating to sex."

But on Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit dismissed the case, saying, "There is no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children...Parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students."

Judge Stephen Reinhardt, writing for the panel, said "no such specific right can be found in the deep roots of the nation's history and tradition or implied in the concept of ordered liberty."

"Anyone who wonders why pro-family organizations like ours have been so concerned about activist courts only has to look at this case," said a spokesman for Focus on the Family.

Carrie Gordon Earll, an issues analyst with Focus on the Family Action, called the ruling "one of the most abhorrent examples of judicial tyranny in American history.

"The 9th Circuit did more than rule against parents who were upset that their elementary-school-aged children were being asked explicit questions about sex in class. They told all parents they have no right to protest what public schools tell their children."

Earll said the court essentially declared parenthood unconstitutional.

"It's long been the liberal view that it takes a village to raise a child -- but never before have the 'villagers' been elevated, as a matter of law, above mothers and fathers.

"Every parent in America should shudder at this decision -- liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican," Earll said.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is the same court that struck down the Pledge of Allegiance in 2002 because of the phrase "under God."


636Jen is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 21 (permalink) Old 11-03-2005, 03:35 PM
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,254
that is plain fawked up.....
Judge is offline  
post #3 of 21 (permalink) Old 11-03-2005, 05:11 PM
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,321
yeah pretty effin stupid...i agree

but sometimes the truth and real reasons are dont know who wrote that, as in you dont know their own views on the subject. you also don't know the exact views of the people interviewed. for example, when they say "Earll said the court essentially declared parenthood unconstitutional." yeah they essentially said it, that's putting words in peoples mouths. the court would never say that parents shouldn't be parents, this was one specific subject, and the court follows EXACTLY what the laws say or don't say, and if there is no law againts it then it's legal and people can't say shit about it.

yes i would be upset too, but if you had control of your house and you were good parents, you would know how to talk to your kids about it and be able to explain better what the survey was about and "sugar coat" it for your kids. i mean give it a damn rest, kids these days are having sex in middle school, even elementary school. what they hear on the playground is WAY worse than anything they ever hear or see in the classroom. so if the parents want to be pissed at somebody, they should be pissed at the other shitty parents in the world.

just my
Neller0414 is offline  
post #4 of 21 (permalink) Old 11-03-2005, 05:58 PM Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,234
Neller....are you kidding??

If my FIRST grader (that would be next year for my 5 year old son) came home and said that they were asked questions on whether or not they could "stop thinking about having sex," I would be LIVID. Every parent I know would protest that school and burn the principal at the stake. Sure, when I was in 5th grade teachers put the girls in one room and the boys in another room and we learned about our own bodies. That's different. That's almost puberty age. SEX talk for a 6 year old?? FAWK that. They asked if they ever thought about having sex or touching other people's "private parts"?? You (well I) teach your kids very early that NO ONE is allowed to touch "private parts" and they they aren't allowed to touch anyone elses. That goes with don't talk to strangers. But asking them if they ever thought about sex? My kid would have to ask what that is! It's not even on his RADAR for Christ sake. That's opening a discussion that, IMO, 5 year olds are too young to understand. I won't give my kids full discloser until they are around 9 or 10....and for the teachers and schools to jump in ahead of me is rediculous. They weren't even INFORMED that it was happening!!! BullSHIT.

636Jen is offline  
post #5 of 21 (permalink) Old 11-03-2005, 06:39 PM
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,324
Well, they don't call it the 9th "Circus" Court for nothing!

It is the single, most overturned Appellate Court in the Nation.

They are a bunch of goofy SOB's who are pretty drunk with "Liberal" power.

We are pretty lucky to not be located in their district.
fasterbusa is offline  
post #6 of 21 (permalink) Old 11-03-2005, 07:23 PM
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,321
my mom has a little sister in big bros/big sis program. she was in 3rd grade when this happened. she came over to our house, i was a senior in high school at this time. she was telling my mom about what happened in recess. she said "this boy named jeremy, i think he likes me" and my mom asked her why, and she said "because he did the h-word to me at lunch today on the playground" and my mom then said "oh he hugged you?" and she said "no, he got on top of me and humped me".

my neice is 6 right now. when she was in kindergarten, we took her out on the lake on my jetskis. she had to pee. my mom told her to go in the lake. she said, and i quote, "my cooch isnt long enough to do that grandma" and she had heard it at school and ever since has refered to a penis and a vagina as a "cooch" and knows what they are. my sister and her husband are probably two of the most protective, responsible parents around, and they were amazed that she had heard that at school.

just because your kids don't know what it is doesn't mean it's not true that kids that age know about sexual things. personally, i find it absolutely disgusting. i couldn't believe that a 3rd grader actually knew what "humping" was. but it's real, and it happens. feel lucky that your kids are hopefully not around other kids that know about these things. and like i said, for a school to be giving those surveys is pretty ridiculous at that age. however, you did say that you tell your kids that people aren't supposed to touch their private parts. therefore, what is the problem with asking them if it has happened?

i'm not trying to justify the school's actions or the survey, or even the court's actions because i have had other experiences with this court's rulings in my government classes. even though it seems ridiculous, there is no law stating that it is illegal, therefore it is legal and it can happen. it's sad but true. the good ole land of the free...
Neller0414 is offline  
post #7 of 21 (permalink) Old 11-03-2005, 07:48 PM Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,234
What I like about the school system here is that my Kindergartner goes on the bus and to school with Preschool, Kinders and first graders only. I can just about garauntee that these kids aren't taking about it in school. After that, the next school up is 2nd - 5th graders. Perhaps the older ones might be.

Honestly, the biggest reason we moved here is because I saw the kind of kids that my kids would be going to school with. We saw them on the playground swearing at 5 and 6 years old. The older kids were lighting the woodchips on fire and drawing on the slide and other parts of the play structure. It was either move to a better school district or put them in private schooling.

I just think it's wrong for the courts to step in and tell "parents they have no right to protest what public schools tell their children." It's bullshit because our taxes money goes there. We are supposed to intrust them to our kids EDUCATION....math, english, science, etc. Leave the other stuff to the parents.

Lucky, didn't you post something a while back about how this 11 year old got pregnant and the parent just threw up her hands and said that it was the school's fault? That's the kind of shit that gets us verdicts like this. If parents were actually taking responsibility for their kids like they SHOULD this wouldn't even be an issue.

636Jen is offline  
post #8 of 21 (permalink) Old 11-03-2005, 08:18 PM
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,321
well thank god you switched school districts and didn't go private, that's even worse.

btw, my parents are both public school teachers, my dad for 35 years and my mom for 27. and my dad taught at a private catholic school for 5 years. luckily they both are in real good districts, my dad's in davison and my mom's in clarkston. so moving to a better district is always a better choice than going private, although just makes it even harder for administrators and teachers to better the system when people move out and money goes away, but still i'd rather see more kids in public schools than private.
Neller0414 is offline  
post #9 of 21 (permalink) Old 11-04-2005, 03:35 AM
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,740
asking 1st, 3rd, and 5th graders explicit sexual questions? what the hell is wrong with these people? general questions is one thing, but explicit is insane. i don't even have kids and i am well aware of the importance of a good school district - the better the school the fewer the shitty-parents neller was talking about...
jjkGURU is offline  
post #10 of 21 (permalink) Old 11-04-2005, 05:34 AM
Best ET 7.77 @ 186mph
DreamRyder's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: West of Chicago
Posts: 6,323
Send a message via Yahoo to DreamRyder
I say if the schools and gov't want to raise my kids "their" way then they need to start paying for ALL their expenses

Until then.. leave my kids upbringing to ME

reckon we'll have to brainwash our kids to tell them when asked about anything not classwork related "My parent needs to be present to discuss such things"

SportbikeWorld Supermoderator

If it's too good to be true... then you must be Dreaming.

ONLY FEMALE WORLD WIDE to run in the 7's with a Prostreet Bike (no bar, slider, 2step, or slicks)

Sponsored by: RCC Turbo, Bellman Oil, Syed Leathers, Schnitz Racing, Boost by Smith, Cycle-Tek, Tiger Racing, Machine Works Racing, R&R Trailers by, Mirror Look Customs, Rev'd Up Motorsports, and ofcourse SportBike World !
DreamRyder is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Sportbike Forum: Sportbike Motorcycle Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome