Right to Vote?? - Sportbike Forum: Sportbike Motorcycle Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 60 (permalink) Old 10-25-2005, 04:36 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,234
Question Right to Vote??

SEATTLE - When he was 22, Willie Robinson shot and killed a woman in the course of a failed carjacking. But in 2002, after 20 years in prison, he was released — and he believes he's paid his debt to society.

Under sentencing laws, the state of Washington agrees. But under another law that bars former felons from voting, he continues to pay.

"I can't vote, and yet I pay taxes toward the salaries of the people who represent me," says Robinson, now a cabinetmaker in suburban Marysville. "Isn't it so that people want us to be productive citizens after getting out? But then we have limited rights to participate. It doesn't make sense."

Robinson is one of about 4.7 million Americans disenfranchised by state laws that suspend or cancel voting rights for people who have committed felonies. He is also African American, putting him in the group of Americans most affected by these laws because blacks are disproportionately convicted of felonies. In some cities, as many as one in three African American men are barred from voting.

The state laws have long been a point of contention among prisoner rights groups. They became a subject of national debate after President Bush won Florida by a razor-thin margin in the 2000 election in a race where voting by ex-felons might easily have changed the outcome.

“What galvanized the debate was the appearance of disenfranchisement law as a tool in electoral combat,” says Alexander Keyssar, professor of history and social policy at Harvard and author of "The Right to Vote."

Part of the controversy was fueled by the conventional, though unproven, notion that African American voters in particular, and people emerging from prison in general, are more likely to vote for Democrats than Republicans.

Some critics say disenfranchisement laws are little more than an extension of old Jim Crow measures designed to dilute the political clout of African American communities. "Whenever you are talking about prison populations, you are talking about race," says Mervyn Mercano, communications director the Right to Vote Coalition in Washington, D.C.

"The truth is, we're set up to fail," says Robinson, who feels lucky not to have ended up on the streets like many former inmates. Since his release, he has cofounded an organization called Justice Works, which helps inmates emerging from prison with the difficult pursuit of housing, jobs and political rights.

Courts back felon exclusion
The Supreme Court has ruled that states have the right to restrict voting so long as they apply laws equally to all races, even if the outcome is uneven.

A 1985 decision, written by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, largely closed the door on arguments about the uneven impact of these laws. The decision notes that the 14th Amendment, which granted all male adults the right to vote, does allow states to exclude people for "participation in rebellion, or other crime."

So while some legal experts argue that the post-Civil War provisions were aimed at excluding traitors — and not, for instance, cattle rustlers — the court allowed states to maintain a broader interpretation of "other crime."

Defenders of these laws say they are not only legal, but logical.

"Somebody who is not willing to follow the law should not claim a right to make the law for everyone else. When you vote that’s what you’re doing," says Roger Clegg, general counsel to the Center for Equal Opportunity, a Washington, D.C., think tank that opposes race-based policy decisions.

Clegg says it makes sense to withhold voting rights, and restore them on a case-by-case basis, depending on the seriousness of the crime, how recently it was committed and whether there were repeat offenses.

The disproportionate impact on African Americans is not a reason to repeal the laws, he says, drawing an analogy: "A disproportionate number of crimes are committed by men, not women, but I don’t think that makes the laws sexist."



Thoughts?



Jen
636Jen is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 60 (permalink) Old 10-25-2005, 04:56 PM
Registered User
 
cookeetree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,448
Re: Right to Vote??

He served his sentence.

IMO, his voting rights should be restored.




In God, we trust; all others must provide data.
cookeetree is offline  
post #3 of 60 (permalink) Old 10-25-2005, 06:58 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,234
I'm sick to death of the criminals being made out like they're the victims.

People are saying if the felons had been allowed to vote in FL, it would have swung the election in favor of Gore?? Well, if I was a Dem (which I'm not!), I wouldn't be too proud to admit that.

Pull up some statistics on the number of felons that are repeat offenders. The vast majority of them are not becoming productive members of society.

This "productive member of society" Robinson was complaining about the use of his tax dollars?? What about the fact that his victim's family had their tax dollars used to support his stupid ass in prison. Can you imagine knowing that your tax money was going to buy HIM 3 squares a day, cable TV, and a freakin gym for the man who murdered your daughter???

It makes me sick as hell that this bastard has the nerve to whine about voting. Can his victim vote? Hmmm, lemme see....oh nope- she's DEAD!!!



Jen
636Jen is offline  
 
post #4 of 60 (permalink) Old 10-25-2005, 08:48 PM
Registered User
 
cookeetree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,448
Wow, Kawi, it's easy to see which way your opinion is swinging.

To be perfectly honest, this guy wouldn't even be alive if I had anything to do with making laws. Life for a life in my book.




In God, we trust; all others must provide data.

Last edited by cookeetree; 10-25-2005 at 09:10 PM.
cookeetree is offline  
post #5 of 60 (permalink) Old 10-25-2005, 10:44 PM
Registered User
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hanford, CA USA 93230
Posts: 577
Send a message via Yahoo to Fatman
he murdered; MURDERED somone in the commission of an ARMED ROBBERY, he shouldn't even be breathing much less walking the streets a free man. fucking lawyers

Build a man a fire, and he is warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he is warm for the rest of his life.

Everything I know I learned from killing smart people and eating their brains.
Fatman is offline  
post #6 of 60 (permalink) Old 10-26-2005, 03:04 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,740
i'm in agreement with cookeetree on both posts. jail time then letting him go wouldn't be my way to deal with murderers, but since the system we have in place says he's paid his debt to society, and ready to be produtive how can we take away his right to vote? and where do we draw the line for what are "acceptable crimes" and those that remove your right to vote?
jjkGURU is offline  
post #7 of 60 (permalink) Old 10-26-2005, 05:41 AM
S370HSSV 0773H
 
spicersh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Terrible Hole, IN
Posts: 7,437
Send a message via Yahoo to spicersh
I'm not sure exactly where I stand on this. I suppose it would have to be a case by case basis. In this particular one, by knowingly and willingly acting outside of the law he chose to remove himself from rights and priveleges afforded to law-abiding citizens of the country. IMO he should have been executed, however since that didn't happen I see no reason to extend full rights to him. He obviously was not interested in them before. He's lucky to be alive and free, so he should stop pushing his luck. I wonder if he voted at all before commiting his crime. Then again, how severe does a crime need to be to justify taking away someone's voting rights? Murder is a fairly easy one. What about other lesser felonies? Tampering with the mail is a felony, should we take away rights for that?

I dunno....like I said, it's a case by case thing for me.

SportbikeWorld Supermoderator

The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all of fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomanical, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully. - Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion
spicersh is offline  
post #8 of 60 (permalink) Old 10-26-2005, 07:35 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,254
Re: Re: Right to Vote??

Quote:
Originally posted by cookeetree
He served his sentence.

IMO, his voting rights should be restored.

my thought exactly.....how long should he punished? He was sentenced...went through the court system and did his time. Saying all Felons are a POS is painting with a pretty broad brush......
Judge is offline  
post #9 of 60 (permalink) Old 10-26-2005, 07:38 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 166
Eye for an Eye!!
apuddy is offline  
post #10 of 60 (permalink) Old 10-26-2005, 09:19 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,798
Thats a difficult one. So I'll back up spicers lack of opinion .
A case by case basis seems alright, except of the added burden on the system. That and when is that decision made, at the time of sentancing or at the time of release?
Perhaps a longer probation on voting rights after release?



Vash is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Sportbike Forum: Sportbike Motorcycle Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome