V4 Vs I4 - Sportbike Forum: Sportbike Motorcycle Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-23-2006, 01:11 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Z_Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,820
V4 Vs I4

Given equal displacement and HP, would the power curve be the same or different, i.e. where the most torque or peak HP lies? Or are these configurations meant to be purely aerodynamic, such as I4 being wider and short, and V4 being narrow and long, and thus no difference in power curve like v-twin vs I4.

Except VFR, why is there such lack of interest in making more bikes with V4 engine in them?

For their superbikes, why did Honda go from V-twin to I4 when equal displacement was given, instead of going back to V5 such as RC45? Don't V configurations supposedly give the "extra" grunt, which is why Honda chose V-5 for RC211V, when most others on the grid are big bang I4? Thanks.
Z_Fanatic is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-23-2006, 06:10 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,798
a 90deg V should be better balanced in theory, then an inline. So performance alone, should be superior. However...
V4 would be a nightmare for designers. While the output is good, they are considerably bigger, physically, thus more difficult to package. The spread the weight out in between their two banks, thus taking away from the mass centralization concept. They also have two heads instead of one, which makes them heavier and more expansive... It isnt a performance thing thats keeping them away, its the practical issue of it all.



Vash is offline  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-23-2006, 09:12 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Z_Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,820
IC, do V4s also inherently have longer stroke than inlines but shorter than v-twins? What makes them better balanced in theory than I4? I always figured that 90 deg V-2s were primarily balance but require counterweights for secondary balance, where as inline, the imbalance is controllable without sacrificing much power or adding counterweights. Does V4 function differently or better? Like I6 or V12 has been known to be best balanced among engines.
Z_Fanatic is offline  
 
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-23-2006, 09:22 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,798
I dont believe any of the above mentioned configurations have any stroke requirment. You could build a very short stroke Vtwin, it would just not do you any good.
As for balancing, well its abit over my head. V4 will use a crank much like the Inline, so each cylinders rotation can be controlled seperatly. The impact comes on two axis, so that could be utilized to better cancel out any unwanted vibrations.

Obviously a better balanced engine would be the flat 4, but again packaging becomes an issue.



Vash is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Sportbike Forum: Sportbike Motorcycle Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome