Anybody know if this is still true?
If memory serves (Motorcyclist Magazine/COG list server?), I read/heard a few years back that lane splitting in CA was not illegal, but if you had an accident while doing so, you were at fault.
If true, that sounds about right. I figured it was just another case of the government wanting it both ways: they want you to lane split in order to ease congestion/pollution, etc, but aren't willing to back you up in case you have an accident, no matter who's at fault.
Anybody know what the scoop on this is? If this is the case, ya might wanna rethink lane splitting until your government decides to back you up on it. If it's not (or never has been) true...nevermind...